Saturday, 18 March 2023
Lorwyn/Morningtide Online & the Lorwyn Player's Guide
Wednesday, 15 March 2023
Magic: the Gathering - The Visual Guide
Sunday, 6 November 2022
The Brothers' War Annotations
The story of accompanying the new Brothers' War set had some surprisingly deep continuity references, so I thought it would be fun to do another round of annotations. Hopefully you'll also find it interesting. And hopefully I can get through the article without too many confusing sentences despite the set The Brothers' War having a story called The Brothers' War which frequently references the novel called The Brothers' War, all of them covering the in-universe event called the Brothers' War...
Before I get into the annotations, a quick review: I thought this story was amazing. Recent Magic stories have often been way too rushed, especially the ones covering planewide wars (Kaldheim, Dominaria United), and the Brothers' War is a complex multi-decade conflict, so I was wondering how it was going to go. Add to that the possible continuity snafu's that are always lurking with a time travel plot, and things could've gone pretty bad. Especially for me, as The Brothers' War is still my favorite Magic story of all time.
Luckily, and I think bravely, WotC decided not to retell the Brothers' War story at all, instead giving us a collection of much more personal stories that build on the established continuity! They cover all the characterization and character interaction I thought was sorely missing from Dominaria United, and go for a level of continuity references that's genuinely impressive. I also love how the ghost of Urza hangs over all the stories, even the ones where you wouldn't expect it (like with Tezzeret wondering about Karn's creator), which subtly but powerfully builds up to him finally appearing in person in the finale.
I do wonder if more casual fans feel cheated by not getting the whole story of the war though. If I were WotC I'd have plastered links to a discounted version of the e-book of The Brothers' War all over my sites and social media. (Or released it for free, but you know, that's not the world we're living in.)
Okay. Now let's dive into the specific references!
Monday, 8 August 2022
Shadowmoor
Shadowmoor
Editor - Philips Athans & Susan J. Morris
Saturday, 23 July 2022
Lorwyn, Morningtide & Eventide
Cover Artists - Mark Zug, Steve Prescott & Christopher Moeller
First Printing - August 2007, January 2008 & June 2008
Saturday, 25 June 2022
Updating the list of sources
Saturday, 11 June 2022
Figuring out the post-Mending timeline
WHY THIS ARTICLE IS A WEEK LATE...
This article was always going to end with a call for criticism. Figuring out a framework for the post-Mending timeline is a bit of a challenge as we don't have an official timeline to use as a base like we did before. Instead you have to piece it all together from in-story references, meaning everything is contingent on everything else. I'd hate to have to redo the entire thing in a few months or even years after I've already used it to place a whole lot of stories, so I was going to invite you all to comment on any mistakes I had made or important sources I had missed.
Then on the day I was going to post this, I was made aware of a Tumblr post made two months ago by Vorthos extraordinair and writer of the "Magic: a Visual History" books Jay Annelli, in which he gives an overview of the entire timeline I'm covering here. And guess what? On first glance, it didn't seem to line up with mine.
What to do with that information? Since Jay is a published Magic author these days I was tempted to chuck all my work in the bin and just declare his Tumblr post official canon, but it only covers in which years blocks happen, and the post-Mending timeline is so compressed that in order to place individual stories you have to work with references to months and sometimes even weeks. The timeline I came up with does go into that much detail, and re-reading it for the third time since finding that Tumblr post, I did still think my logic was sound. So I decided that the article was going to have to be delayed for a while so I could figure out how I could harmonize my timeline with Jay's.
It took a week for me to find a quiet moment to do so, but in the end all it came down to was some tricky conversion between ZC and AR dates. In fact, using Jay's timeline and one or two assumptions I could make my timeline even more detailed! So below you'll find the article I had intended to post last week, and then a short addendum where I put my results next to Jay's for an even more specificity.
All that said, the call for criticism still stands. I haven't re-read all the post-Mending sources for this article (I mean, obviously, the whole point of this was to create a framework for the future re-reading I'll do for the blog), so if you think I'm missing a crucial bit of information, please do share it with me so I can see how it fits with my conclusions thus far.











